Aoi Ito vs Nanaka Sato Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L L W W W L
Form
L L LHead To Head: Ito 1 - 0 Sato
They have played 3 sets in total, with Ito winning 2 and Sato winning 1. The last match between Ito and Sato was at the W25 Makinohara, 03-10-2022, Q1 round, Grass with Aoi Ito getting the victory 2-6 6-4 10-6.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Aoi Ito | 1 |
| Nanaka Sato | 0 |
W25 Makinohara(03-10-2022)
2
6
6
4
10
6
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Keys VS Vekic PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
28 Apr 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Khachanov VS Paul PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 6-4 10-6 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 16 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Aoi Ito Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats 
Ena Shibahara
Player
Aoi Ito
71%
(
92 of
129)
1st Serve %
65%
(
80 of
123)
7
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
59%
(
54 of
92)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
48 of
80)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
45%
(
58 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
58 of
123)
129
Total Points Won
123
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aoi Ito
Player
Heather Watson
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aoi Ito
Player
Mei Yamaguchi
62%
(
59 of
95)
1st Serve %
71%
(
73 of
103)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
43%
(
41 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
54 of
103)
108
Total Points Won
90
|
6-2 6-7(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aoi Ito
Player
Emina Bektas
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
9
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Malene Helgo
Player
Aoi Ito
58%
(
52 of
89)
1st Serve %
63%
(
60 of
96)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
50 of
96)
103
Total Points Won
82
|
6-0 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lauren Davis
Player
Aoi Ito
55%
(
64 of
116)
1st Serve %
74%
(
77 of
104)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
45 of
77)
50%
(
26 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
51 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
104)
110
Total Points Won
110
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aoi Ito
Player
Eva Lys
68%
(
79 of
116)
1st Serve %
60%
(
57 of
95)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
56%
(
44 of
79)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
48%
(
56 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
50 of
95)
110
Total Points Won
101
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aoi Ito
Player
Ksenia Efremova
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
9
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
24 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Aoi Ito
61%
(
51 of
84)
1st Serve %
62%
(
49 of
79)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aoi Ito
Player
Daria Snigur
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
83%
(
86 of
103)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
52%
(
33 of
64)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
45 of
86)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
48%
(
48 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
52 of
103)
104
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Nanaka Sato Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Honoka Kobayashi
Player
Nanaka Sato
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve %
80%
(
61 of
76)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
76)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joanna Garland
Player
Nanaka Sato
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve %
56%
(
23 of
41)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
9 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 2-6 6-4 10-6 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67% (164/79) | Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) |
| 64% (354/197) | Sets Win/Loss | 14% (1/6) |
| 56% (2833/2248) | Games Win/Loss | 33% (21/42) |
| 69% (131/58) | Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 70% (7/3) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (19/15) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 70% (7/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) |
| 0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0 |
| 214 | Aces Total | 0 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
| 602 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:20:25 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 355.37 | Average Opponent Rank | 165.33 |
| 71% (10286/14513) | 1st Serve % | 72% (84/117) |
| 59% (6096/10286) | 1st Serve Win % | 42% (35/84) |
| 46% (1944/4227) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (13/33) |
| 50% (976/1943) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (1/4) |
| 49% (6822/14054) | Return Points Win % | 28% (23/81) |
| 0% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 64% (7/4) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (5/5) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 67% (103/51) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/3) |
| 73% (49/18) | Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 68% (160/237) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 43% (20/46) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 59% (41/70) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 91% (152/138) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 9% (152/13) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 29% (90/26) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
